N.L. – court’s efforts to case manage procedure and focus dispute overlap with arbitration’s benefits – #417

To assist the parties to reach the merits and perhaps resolve related issues not squarely before the court,  Mr. Justice Glen L.C. Noel in Oleynik v. Kachanoski, 2021 NLSC 4 wielded four (4) different procedural tools when adjudicating a procedural dispute: (i) assume case management; (ii) encourage elimination of preliminary procedural initiatives; (iii) ‘direct’ alternative dispute resolution; and, (iv) caution costs.  Only (i) and (iv) were within Noel J.’s express jurisdiction to order. Lacking jurisdiction under (ii) to prevent Respondent altogether from presenting its preliminary application or (iii) to impose mediation, Noel J. did expressly urge or “direct” consideration of the options.  Noel J.’s efforts reflect the courts’ genuine interest in assisting parties to either reduce or focus their disputes and incur less time and cost.  Those efforts overlap with the benefits commonly expected in arbitration and expressly urge litigants to seek out those benefits.

Continuer la lecture de « N.L. – court’s efforts to case manage procedure and focus dispute overlap with arbitration’s benefits – #417 »

N.L. – agreement to arbitrate renewal option’s financial terms ensures lease is enforceable – #369

In Copper Stop Limited v. Parkland Fuel Corporation, 2020 NLSC 114, Madam Justice Kendra J. Goulding had to resolve a lease dispute which arose when the lessee sought to exercise an option to renew but for which the lease provided no specific term governing the method or time within which to exercise that option.  Despite lessor’s argument that the lease was enforceable, Goulding J. held that the option to renew was enforceable as the financial terms of the renewal option were capable of being made definite through imposition by the arbitrator.  The ability to arbitrate if negotiations failed made the lease’s renewal option more than just “an agreement to agree”.

Continuer la lecture de « N.L. – agreement to arbitrate renewal option’s financial terms ensures lease is enforceable – #369 »

N.L. – city lacks authority to impose arbitration unrelated to legislation’s purpose/intent – #207

In St. John’s (City) v. 10718 Nfld. Inc., 2019 NLCA 41, Newfoundland and Labrador’s Court of Appeal upheld a first instance decision declaring that the City of St. John’s (the “City”) cannot require mandatory arbitration in an agreement as a term of approval of development as doing so is acting beyond its jurisdiction under its enabling legislation. See the earlier Arbitration Matters note “Newfoundland and Labrador court holds that a municipality has authority to agree to arbitration but not to impose it as a condition of regulatory approval« 

Continuer la lecture de « N.L. – city lacks authority to impose arbitration unrelated to legislation’s purpose/intent – #207 »

N.L. – ‘legislative language to the contrary’ provides option of court proceedings or arbitration – #176

In Dewey v. Corner Brook Pulp and Paper Limited, 2019 NLCA 14, Newfoundland and Labrador’s Court f Appeal held that the applications judge had erred in ordering a stay of a proposed class action when he found that the dispute could only be resolved by mandatory arbitration.  Based on its interpretation of the legislation first introduced in 1915 and amended subsequently, the Court held that the legislation, from the onset and despite amendments, provided for the option of arbitration or court proceedings.  The Court identified the result as an exception, based on “legislative language to the contrary”, to courts enforcing mandatory arbitration.

Continuer la lecture de « N.L. – ‘legislative language to the contrary’ provides option of court proceedings or arbitration – #176 »

N.L. – reciprocal enforcement of court judgment enforcing awards not opportunity for collateral attack of awards – #170

In Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. Retirement Home Specialists Inc., 2019 NLSC 44, Mr. Justice Robert P. Stack upheld an ex parte Newfoundland and Labrador court decision registering as its own judgment an earlier Ontario court decision enforcing awards.  In dismissing defendants’ contestation as a collateral attack on the awards, Stack J. listed alternative procedural steps which might have provided plausible opportunity to challenge the awards.  Stack J. underlined the limited role of the Ontario court enforcing an arbitration award under its Arbitration Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 17, and the Newfoundland and Labrador court providing reciprocal enforcement of another province’s court judgments under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act, RSNL 1990, c R-4.

Continuer la lecture de « N.L. – reciprocal enforcement of court judgment enforcing awards not opportunity for collateral attack of awards – #170 »